Although we know many of the details, the presentation of the Note 2a surprised us in some ways. The manufacturer decided to launch a truly competitively priced device that rubs shoulders with its big brother in many aspects.
Yes, no phone (2a) is less than no phone (2). However, the price gap between one and the other is important, so it is worth asking ourselves, are their differences really justified? Which of them is the best buy? We compare no phone (2a). There is no telephone (2) to answer all these questions.
Specifications Comparison Table: No Phone (2a) Vs. No Phone (2)
Different on the outside but more similar on the inside than you might think.
Visually, these two phones are clearly different from each other. Yes, of course it repeats the clear back and the Glyph interface (LED bands), but it chooses a very simple design in any phone (2a). In addition, the camera module moves from the lower left corner to the center of the device and places itself horizontally.
Although we count them back to (2a), they are easily noticeable aesthetic changes. But, the truth is that this couple is more similar than you think and here are the proofs:
Design (Construction): They have both Glass backs, aluminum frames, IP54 protection and Gorilla Glass 5, so they are equal. The phone (2) has already been confirmed to be in good working order. Screen: Both 6.7-inch AMOLED panels with Full HD+ resolution and frequency up to 120 Hz. However, eIn no phone (2) the frequency is variable. 1 to 120 Hz (LTPO) and maximum brightness is better (1600 nits vs. 1300 nits). Processor: The Nothing Phone (2) Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is 70% more powerful. que el Dimensity 7200 Pro Dell no phone (2a).
Random Access Memory: In both cases, you will find versions with 8 or 12 GB and LPDDR5 format. Storage: Both have UFS 3.1 storage in 128 or 256 GB capacity, however The phone has a (2) 512 GB version.. Software: Both will have three major Android updates, but The phone (2) starts with Android 14. The phone (2) launched with Android 13. Rear Cameras: Both have the same sensors Sony IMX890 (50 MP main) and Samsung JN1 (50 MP ultra wide angle + macro). Their focus units, focus technologies and more are the same, although the phone (2a) doesn’t record in 4K @ 6 FPS. Front cameras: The same 32 MP Sony IMX615 sensorCuriously though, the phone (2) has a worse aperture (f/2.5 vs. f/2.2). Sound: Both have stereo speakers, but el Phone (2) es compatible with Snapdragon Sound. Battery: The phone (2a) has slightly more capacity (5000 mAh vs. 4700 mAh). And the same wired charger (45W). However, the phone has (2) 15W wireless charging.
Which mobile phone is best for you? No phone (2a) or no phone (2)?
After reading this quick comparison, you’ve come to the following conclusion: Apart from the differences in power and wireless charging, the Phone (2a) and the Phone (2) are not that different from each other. Yes, it is true that it weighs 70% more performance, but lRaw power is not everything in mobile And many of us know that the current processors perform very well even in the mid-range.
So it’s worth asking yourself: Is it worth buying any phone (2a) versus any other phone (2a) on the market? We’re in a very similar diatribe with the Google Pixel 7a and Pixel 7, which look very similar. However, in this case, the price difference is very large:
No phone (2a): from 329 euros in the 8 GB + 128 GB version. No phone (2): from 649 euros in the 8 GB + 128 GB version.
What we are talking about (2a) Spend almost double what you can afford (2). A €320 difference to get the same amount of RAM, storage and camera as well as the same screen and less battery. Any phone (2a) is definitely a smarter buy than its bigger brother.
