Since the first public version of Chatgpt surprised the world at the end of 2022, they did not stop proliferating new Linguistic models More and more powerful and with better skills.
And with the dizzying development of the AI, it was also generated A new concern in society… Will it no longer do artificial intelligence? Because the results of a study seem to confirm what many feared.
The prestigious Institute Technological Institute of Massachusetts (MIT) has just published an investigation that demonstrates the Negative impact on human intelligence caused by the use of artificial intelligence tools.
A MIT study suggests that the use of chatgpt can affect intelligence and thought skills
A new MIT study published by Time magazine suggests that the use of chatgpt influence critical and learning skills of thinking. It was an essay with 54 participants divided into three groups. Each group had to write several essays similar to those of the admission examination of US universities.
A group used chatgpt as a help, another used only the Google search engine and the third group did not use any external tool. While they wrote, The brain activity was monitored using an electroencephalogram. In addition, the essays were revised by the teachers of the Institute.
The results showed that the group that used chatgpt was the one who presented the Lower cerebral activity compared to the other two groups. And not only that, for several months, it has been observed that chatgpt users tend to become more dependent on artificial and lazy intelligence In every essay.
To this we must add that teachers mentioned that group tests used by Chatgpt They had no independent ideas, Critical thinking And they were quite similar among the participants of this group.
In this way, the authors of the investigation concluded that it could be the use of artificial intelligence such as chatgpt harmful to the learning process, especially in young people. These tools, although facilitating work, could reduce critical thinking skills and the ability to be actively involved in resolving problems.
Now, These results must be cautiously taken. The study is very small (only 54 people participated) and was published before passing through a complete between complete review. This means that others The field experts have not yet evaluated him It is valid for the methodology, the conclusions, etc.
Why was it published before why? Because one of his authors expressed their concern so much in the validation of this investigation. And, which, in the delay, begins to adopt prematurely and enormously in the education of early childhood.
And you… Do you think the IA is not back fool?
